Fender vs Warwick sound comparison

Аватар автора
Звуковое искусство
0:00 Fender both pups (slap) 0:10 Warwick both pups (slap) 0:19 Fender both pups (finger) 0:28 Warwick both pups (finger) 0:38 Fender front pups (slap) 0:47 Warwick front pups (slap) 0:56 Fender front pups (finger) 1:06 Warwick front pups (finger) 1:15 Fender rear pups (slap) 1:24 Warwick rear pups (slap) 1:34 Fender rear pups (finger) 1:43 Warwick rear pups (finger) sound comparison of Fender & Warwick played all EQ flat, tone roll up (Fender) and flat EQ active preamp through (Warwick). recorded with steinberg UR22, through zoom B3n ( Air+Room reverb) and no any effects added. warwick sounds brighter and more solid, and also bonucy, because of its high string tension resulting from the 2-piece warwick bridge. Fender has more warm tone, and good compression especially when slapping or played on front pups on the other hand. Both basses have opposite tone option... please let me know what you think below the comment! 【Fender】 Fender 75th anniversary commermorative Jazz bass Ash/maple/rosewood Custom Shop &Single-Coil Jazz Bass 【Warwick】 warwick corvette standard bubinga 1997 (replaced MEC dynamic correction to MEC active 3-band) Bubinga/wenge/wenge MEC active singlecoil pups MEC active 3-band preamp zoom B3n Steinberg UR22 #warwick

0/0


0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0