S3 TRIO3D/2X vs. AMD K6-2 300

Аватар автора
Java Практика
Can the big brother of the infamous 3D decelerator beat software rendering on a common CPU of the time? 00:00 Colin McRae Rally (1998) 01:00 I&Got Some Balls (1999) 01:40 Homeworld (1999) 02:40 Microsoft Flight Simulator 98 (1997) The answer is yes, since the Trio3D/2X is about twice as fast, provided that you disable texture filtering. With texture filtering enabled (not shown in the video), speed not unusually about equal. A downside is that the card has poor compatibility and frequent rendering artifacts. The following games were also tested but failed to run: - Tomb Raider (S3D patch doesn&support the Trio) - Midtown Madness (system freeze after intro video) - Motocross Madness 2 (system freeze after intro video) - GLQuake (OpenGL error on launch, with and without Techland GL-to-S3D wrapper) - Thief Gold (system freeze after menus) System specs: AMD K6-2 300 (3x100) S3 Trio3D/2X (latest non-beta drivers) 96 MB SDRAM (66) PC-Chips M577 Windows 98 SE

0/0


0/0

0/0

0/0